Vista genuine crack

There is permanent method to crack Vista activation. Windows Vista. Restart the computer. Boot up to BIOS by pressing Esc or F2 or F10 or other key right after computer starts and shows initial screen, depending on your computer model. Set the computer date to 26 December Exit and save the BIOS settings. Install Windows Vista. Disable automatically synchronize computer time with Internet time server feature in Windows Vista. E ntering the computer BIOS again.

Set back the time to current date and time in BIOS. Save and exit the BIOS configuration menu. Connect to the Internet. Technology and Science. Tagged crack , cracked , microsoft , wga : Related Tags: genuine advantage , windows genuine , media player , windows update , windows system , windows. Subscribe to Blog via RSS. Featured Videos.

Featured Events. Skype's Social Media Accounts Hacked. My serious guess is that blocking the crack would make people pay for Vista. Even among those who buy legitimate copies of Vista, I wonder how many people buy three copies for the three people in the house. If Windows is better than Linux, then let it compete on its merits, not this BS.

While I know none of these things will happen, it would be interesting to see what would happen if people stopped cracking Windows and all of the people who offer free technical support for Windows stopped doing so.

Where do people get copies of vista to crack in the first place? Does Microsoft offer trial copies? Or is it p2p? Suddenly a crack for Vista is released. Do you see something here?

I believe the main Pantheon developer is Bill Gates. He cannot persuade the stockholders of Microsoft to give Vista for free their only option and he releases cracks. Mr Pantheon you waste your time and money. Vista cannot be saved even if you brought it to my door plus a pizza plus two chicks all for free. I could probably accept at least a dual-boot environment under those conditions.

How can anyone consider those prices to be reasonable? Cracking Vista is useless because these copies will have a short life: in a few days or the next month Microsoft will deactivate these cracked copies and they will become not genuine again.

Searching for a crack is also dangerous, because it could contain a trojan or a backdoor, searching for a crack is also annoying because every month you have to search for a new one…. I think you missunderstood my point. I do think that you should pay for Vista if you use it, though — I can certainly agree with the OP there.

There is no need to search for new cracks monthly. A new release is supposed to be out in No, I do not use a pirated version of windows, I have a mac. I have managed to get the computer into a spiral of death where everytime I tried to open a window, the parent process would grind to a halt. How did you get it to last? I remember them saying that the Vista anti piracy system was unbreakable because they spent so much time to design and develop it. It has nothing to do with development, but with decision to release spec.

No need to crack something that does half the things that were promised at an outrageous price…. Yes that sounds like the right solution but the argument has always been that MS has established enough lock in types of situations that many are forced to use Windows whether they want or not. To be fair, there was a couple of problems with cyrillic locale in some improperly used forum engines.

The problem with standards is that anyone can create them. Standards are easier to create than software. You have to look at what people are actually using and doing, rather than some arbitrarially-chosen standard that all people ideally should be using. True, but MS continually deviate from accepted, established standards. I believe your assertion is incorrect. Anybody can create a computer language, file system, etc.

They actually just create recommendations. How they are implemented or not determines if they become standard. Standards should not be controlled by a single entity, but by a group. As of now I believe that, as far as web standards go, the W3C recommendation are considered the standard for the web markup language.

Well, the main problem is some corporations that use web browsers for secure transactions. There is simply more offered game wise with Windows than any other platform. Please stop making inaccurate comments. Making a business agreement between 2 companies does not constitute Microsoft buying Novell.

Some people just refuse to see it because they love the idea of a fair sized company like Novell being one of the pillars of Linux.

I thought it was rather slow personally; Windows XP was cracked and out the door 64 days before launch. But god forbid if you ahve to pay for software. Why is it that all other professions can command their price and we as consumers pay that price but when it comes to software we are all talking about not spending on Vista and running Linux or BSD?.

Why should software be free? How many of you have even looked at the source code for Linux or the source code for Mozilla or the source code for Helix Player? If Linus told everybody tomorrow that he is going to charge for his kernel and it will be open source, I bet ya, IBM would go back to flogging AIX and Novell would go back to flogging Netware and Redhat would just wither and die. You would lose that bet. I use freely licensed software to avoid vendor lock-in.

Being at the mercy of sole-source suppliers is too expensive. Dealing with the whims of single suppliers is affordable only if your time is free. I benefit when anyone else reads the code. We look out for each other. Shared efforts in a community work well, and have since before recorded history.

Wanna bet your salary for 1 year? This is a ridiculously confused argument in the first place, and frankly even weak as a strawman. Flash animation that is at best worth a chuckle and at worst is vulgar or just plain stupid is not as important to, well anyone, as their OS of choice. Oh, dog farts. I use linux because I prefer it. Next choice would be OS X. If all these were unavailable, I would sit down with a pen and paper before I would be forced to use Vista. Hey man, the world is not spinning around you!

Sorry, but I suppose you have never had to get some work done to get your sweeties. As soon as you get to the world of a job to be made and time lines to be met, you will use any OS even Vista jut to work with, not to pray to…. Lots of people use Windows one of those duh points. Like you I use Windows daily because the application I want to use are only available on the Windows platform.

A lot of people are sick of Microsoft. Not everybody of course. Many could care less about what OS they use as long as they can get their jobs done. Nothing wrong with that. That is why I would like to use Linux. I actually use XP as my desktop at work, but none of my job requires windows at all. There are a few apps that my company uses, most notably ones that use activex web frontends or are windows-only apps, that require me to use windows.

From them you would have seen I work in a computer consultancy company. We use ALL operating systems. If your work was so important, your bosses would want the safeguard of a system less prone to attack than XP.

You do not care as long as your pdf reaches print service when it is supposed to. And when it does, you are already in the middle of a new project. And so it goes…. Having to deal with MS crap all day would just be no fun and would eventually just get me depressed.

Find a linux vendor would would be willing to say that their non-x86 platform is equal in quality and features to their x86 platform. The other byproduct is fragmentation, along with the more popular platforms being more supported than the obscure ones by application developers, driver writers, etc.

Which is why…. In reality, Linux only runs well on maybe platforms, i. He has to convince all the thousands of developers involved.